Expertise Orthodoxy
Posted by Dustin Britt on March 4, 2011 ShareWe come head-to-head with the issue of expertise quite a bit in our practice – both for our own brand as well as our clients. The discussion goes something like this, ‘If we focus too much on one specialty, we loose out on a segment of customers‘. And the other side of the debate says, ‘And if we generalize, our customers won't know us for anything‘. The dilemma of being a specialist vs a generalist.
Customers need to attach a specific value to a brand, but most organizations have a broad range of offerings to choose from. Discontinuing those offerings may impact a business negatively, but at the same time, being known for too many will also dilute a customer's understanding of that brand.
In the following graph we break out how an organization can move from a very broadly understood brand – a generalist – to a highly niche brand – a specialist:
- Specialist / Generalist: Focused on a very niche discipline, while offering that specialized service to a broader market.
- Generalist / Specialist: Focused on a broad offering of services to a very specific segment of the market.
- Specialist / Specialist: Focused on offering a very niche discipline to a very specific segment of the market.
- Generalist / Generalist: Focused on a broad offering of services to a broad market.
We would say that Matchstic is a Specialist / Generalist; we are focused on a very specialized discipline (Brand Identity) while offering that niche service to a wide range of industries (B2C, B2B, Non-profit, service-based, product-oriented, and on).
There are pros and cons to each, as well as a few trends that seemingly emerge:
- The Specialist / Generalist has the benefit of expertise as does the Generalist / Specialist.
- The Specialist / Specialist is hyper-focused, and while extremely niche oriented, may be so much so that they become stagnant.
- And the Generalist / Generalist may be the least desirable, with seemingly no expertise and little for customers to attach meaning to.
To conclude, it seems that balance and symmetry are key; too far in either direction and discipline or perspective are lost.











6 Comments
"Right on Dustin. Excellent way to break this down. I'm gonna steal it :)."
- Craig Johnson
"dood love this post. really well articulated. This may be a good exercise for Brand Camp....you may already do it in a way but I think entrepreneurs can easily grasp this concept and would welcome the fork in the road."
- Roy Keely
"I would put our shop in the Generalist/Specialist category. We have a specific type of client that we target with a wide range of services. It has worked out very nicely.
With the exception of generalist/generalist, there can be huge success in any of the options. The key, as I see it, is to fully commit to your area."
- austinklee
"Shoe-In for Article-of-the-Day!"
- hunterwriterer
"Great post Dustin. We've always referred to this as a horizontal nice vs. a vertical niche. Most people get the idea of a vertical niche (serving QSR, CPG, etc) and the horizontal niche has been growing too in our industry. They key benefit of being both a vertically and horizontally niched company is that you are THE expert in that area. I love the stuff that Blair Enns puts out and his philosophy is that by double-niching you can charge more and subvert any RFP or bid situations. That said, it's a hard to write off that many industries or disciplines unless you are really, really good at that one specific thing."
- Adam Houston
"[...] Expertise Orthodoxy: Our friends down south have an EXCELLENT article on being a Specialist vs. being a Generalist, breaking down how an organization can move from being a very broad brand to a highly niche brand. [...]"
- Weekend Reading: The Manly Trenta Edition