<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#8216;Bou</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from a Brand Identity House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-21055</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-21055</guid>
		<description>not a big fan of the rebrand for most of the same reasons that have all been stated above. Dan, I commend you for mocking up your own but I think yours looks mean… Like the Caribou will jump out and kick me in the face is I dont choose the right drink :) Good work though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not a big fan of the rebrand for most of the same reasons that have all been stated above. Dan, I commend you for mocking up your own but I think yours looks mean… Like the Caribou will jump out and kick me in the face is I dont choose the right drink <img src='http://matchstic.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Good work though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Favs 2_26_10&#160;&#124;&#160;ScriptureShorts.tv</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20921</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Favs 2_26_10&#160;&#124;&#160;ScriptureShorts.tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20921</guid>
		<description>[...] Caribou Coffee&#8217;s Brand Redesign [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caribou Coffee&#8217;s Brand Redesign [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Favs 2_26_10&#160;&#124;&#160;Timbuktoons Studio</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20920</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Favs 2_26_10&#160;&#124;&#160;Timbuktoons Studio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20920</guid>
		<description>[...] Caribou Coffee&#8217;s Brand Redesign [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caribou Coffee&#8217;s Brand Redesign [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Johnson</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20911</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20911</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s excellent Dan!  I love it.  Much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s excellent Dan!  I love it.  Much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20906</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20906</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like it either. The two spoons that come together to form an abstract coffee bean screams &quot;first week at art-shool&quot; project. It&#039;s also got that wanna-be 1955 feel and not in a cool retro way. It just doesn&#039;t work. They went backwards instead of forward. To put my money where my mouth is, I mocked up my own version... http://danalmasy.com/snapshots/dancaribou.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like it either. The two spoons that come together to form an abstract coffee bean screams &#8220;first week at art-shool&#8221; project. It&#8217;s also got that wanna-be 1955 feel and not in a cool retro way. It just doesn&#8217;t work. They went backwards instead of forward. To put my money where my mouth is, I mocked up my own version&#8230; <a href="http://danalmasy.com/snapshots/dancaribou.png" rel="nofollow">http://danalmasy.com/snapshots/dancaribou.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Gott</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Gott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20884</guid>
		<description>I agree (although I really don&#039;t know what I&#039;m talking about). They reinforced their coffee focus with the &#039;bean&#039;. The overall feel seems generic. Oh, oh! I got it... the blue backdrop is a teabag! Aha! (remember I don&#039;t know what I&#039;m talking about?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree (although I really don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m talking about). They reinforced their coffee focus with the &#8216;bean&#8217;. The overall feel seems generic. Oh, oh! I got it&#8230; the blue backdrop is a teabag! Aha! (remember I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m talking about?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @austinklee</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20864</link>
		<dc:creator>@austinklee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20864</guid>
		<description>Craig and Blake hit the nail on the head!  Muddled messaging from Caribou.  I echo Brittany...nice scoop Craig!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig and Blake hit the nail on the head!  Muddled messaging from Caribou.  I echo Brittany&#8230;nice scoop Craig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittany Thoms</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20860</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittany Thoms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20860</guid>
		<description>First of all, nice scoop Craig. Has this been released anywhere else? Secondly, I don&#039;t like the new logo at all. If anything, given these two identities without knowing which came first, I would think the original would be the appropriate rebrand, which says that a) it&#039;s more appealing and b) it fits the brand better. I agree with Blake also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, nice scoop Craig. Has this been released anywhere else? Secondly, I don&#8217;t like the new logo at all. If anything, given these two identities without knowing which came first, I would think the original would be the appropriate rebrand, which says that a) it&#8217;s more appealing and b) it fits the brand better. I agree with Blake also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruthanne burch</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20859</link>
		<dc:creator>ruthanne burch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20859</guid>
		<description>&quot;it&#039;s interesting.&quot; that was my first thought. i agree with blake i like the attempt at being simple but i don&#039;t see how this reflects their new push into the world of tea. i wonder how many people will see the hidden symbols in there too. i also think that the script may be hard to read for some people. 
it will be interesting to see how other people react to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it&#8217;s interesting.&#8221; that was my first thought. i agree with blake i like the attempt at being simple but i don&#8217;t see how this reflects their new push into the world of tea. i wonder how many people will see the hidden symbols in there too. i also think that the script may be hard to read for some people.<br />
it will be interesting to see how other people react to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Howard</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/02/new-bou/comment-page-1/#comment-20858</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4904#comment-20858</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t like it. I love the attempt of simplicity, always good intentions, but the mark becomes generic and ambiguous for me. Also I could see some issues with the readability of that script type at small sizes. I don&#039;t see how this new direction helps with the &quot;tea&quot; focus at all... especially with the coffee bean shape in the middle. However, my biggest concern is not the new logo design, but the decision to rebrand at all. Sometimes I feel like stagnate brands use it as an attempt to gain momentum when its not the logo that needs fixing- its the business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t like it. I love the attempt of simplicity, always good intentions, but the mark becomes generic and ambiguous for me. Also I could see some issues with the readability of that script type at small sizes. I don&#8217;t see how this new direction helps with the &#8220;tea&#8221; focus at all&#8230; especially with the coffee bean shape in the middle. However, my biggest concern is not the new logo design, but the decision to rebrand at all. Sometimes I feel like stagnate brands use it as an attempt to gain momentum when its not the logo that needs fixing- its the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

