<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Recycle. Repair.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/01/dont-recycle-repair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/01/dont-recycle-repair/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from a Brand Identity House</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kat</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/01/dont-recycle-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-19993</link>
		<dc:creator>kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4503#comment-19993</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big fan of the repair movement. I ordered some of this great silicone &quot;fix-it&quot; material from a new company called Sugru last month (and am anxiously awaiting it&#039;s arrival in the next month, since it&#039;s their second run of production). They are huge on the fix it initiative with a great product, a playdoe-like compound that cures to solid silicone at room temp - http://sugru.com/ - the site has awesome examples of creative ways in which people have fixed their stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of the repair movement. I ordered some of this great silicone &#8220;fix-it&#8221; material from a new company called Sugru last month (and am anxiously awaiting it&#8217;s arrival in the next month, since it&#8217;s their second run of production). They are huge on the fix it initiative with a great product, a playdoe-like compound that cures to solid silicone at room temp &#8211; <a href="http://sugru.com/" rel="nofollow">http://sugru.com/</a> &#8211; the site has awesome examples of creative ways in which people have fixed their stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin Diec</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/01/dont-recycle-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-19779</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin Diec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4503#comment-19779</guid>
		<description>Technology seems to be an entirely different animal because the speed at which it changes now. Apple has absolutely no incentive to build an indestructible iPod with replaceable parts since nobody will keep theirs for longer than a couple years.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
On the other hand, when it comes to more old-fashioned things I find there&#039;s a lot of benefit to spending a little more time researching, and even spending more money upfront to get a product that was made with pride and will last forever.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
A couple examples come to mind. Allen Edmonds is part of a small minority of companies that manufactures their product domestically. They focus on hand-made, quality shoes and even have a program called &quot;Recrafting&quot; -- where they will rebuild your worn shoes like new. Like the Open bike shop, they&#039;d rather give up the quick, reductive salesman-customer relationship for the richer one of repairer-repairee.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Sites like Design*Sponge are dedicated to DIY, furniture restoration projects -- helping people turn something like their grandmother&#039;s old coffee table into something new and fresh.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
It&#039;s not unlike the different relationships an agency can have with a client in our field. You can make a quick buck with wham-bam, here&#039;s your logo, website, and collateral approach, or foster a longer-lasting relationship of co-authoring and evolving a brand together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology seems to be an entirely different animal because the speed at which it changes now. Apple has absolutely no incentive to build an indestructible iPod with replaceable parts since nobody will keep theirs for longer than a couple years.</p>
<p>
On the other hand, when it comes to more old-fashioned things I find there&#8217;s a lot of benefit to spending a little more time researching, and even spending more money upfront to get a product that was made with pride and will last forever.
</p>
</p>
<p>
A couple examples come to mind. Allen Edmonds is part of a small minority of companies that manufactures their product domestically. They focus on hand-made, quality shoes and even have a program called &#8220;Recrafting&#8221; &#8212; where they will rebuild your worn shoes like new. Like the Open bike shop, they&#8217;d rather give up the quick, reductive salesman-customer relationship for the richer one of repairer-repairee.
</p>
</p>
<p>
Sites like Design*Sponge are dedicated to DIY, furniture restoration projects &#8212; helping people turn something like their grandmother&#8217;s old coffee table into something new and fresh.
</p>
</p>
<p>
It&#8217;s not unlike the different relationships an agency can have with a client in our field. You can make a quick buck with wham-bam, here&#8217;s your logo, website, and collateral approach, or foster a longer-lasting relationship of co-authoring and evolving a brand together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://matchstic.com/blog/2010/01/dont-recycle-repair/comment-page-1/#comment-19687</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matchstic.com/blog/?p=4503#comment-19687</guid>
		<description>Good post Al. I agree in heart, but my head says no. I have a 35&quot; tube TV from &#039;95 that has been my main TV since. It had some repair work done back in the early &#039;00s and has done well. But Flat Screens have been calling my name for years. Any thoughts on how we address the tension between innovation and longevity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Al. I agree in heart, but my head says no. I have a 35&#8243; tube TV from &#8217;95 that has been my main TV since. It had some repair work done back in the early &#8217;00s and has done well. But Flat Screens have been calling my name for years. Any thoughts on how we address the tension between innovation and longevity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

