I recently read this interview with Rick Klotz, owner/designer of the apparel brand Freshjive. It’s a really interesting read in which Rick explains his growing distaste with the concept of branding and how he’s decided to not use any logos on any of his new products. He’s not sure what the outcome will mean, but he’s following his heart with this move.
I would like to make an argument that he still has a brand, he’s just changed his brand strategy and let the visual identity flow out of that strategy. It’s not possible to not have a brand, but you may base your brand on having little “logo” value, which is fine.
What I love most about what he’s done is that he has built his brand to be authentic to who he is on the inside. Anytime brands try to be something that they aren’t, they lose the power of great communication.
What do you think? Is it possible to have no brand at all? Or is this just a “no-brand” brand strategy?
Thanks to my good friend and old co-worker, Mike Scully, for making me aware of this.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 19th, 2009 at 6:00 am and is filed under Rebrand. You can follow any responses to this entry through the feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
7 Comments
While I commend the intention of "FreshJive", if that black-rectangle-with-white-border stays consistent on their shirts (on that third photo it looks like it's visible from the outside), it will become their "logo"."
- Alvin Diec
- Craig Johnson
- Mike Landman
- Craig Johnson
- Blake Howard
I say this to say, as Winokur pointed out, by saying you are not going to have a brand, you are creating a brand. Your brand is no brand. As Craig says, it gets your attention and gets people talking!!!"
- Andy Leonard


Of course it's not possible to have no brand at all. Your brand might be a "no-brand", but it's still a brand. Just like in the movie - not having an act was his act.
It is possible though to have no brand awareness..."
- Steven Winokur