Law 14 of The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding
What branding builds, subbranding can destroy. Holiday in wanted to get into upscale hotels. Cadillac wanted to introduce a smaller car. Donna Karan wanted to make cheaper and more casual clothes. What did they do? They didn’t create new brands for the new ideas. No, they came up with Holiday Inn Crowne Plaza, Cadillac Catera and DKNY. I highly doubt that before the moments those subbrands were introduced did any one ask Holiday Inn if they had a more expensive place to stay, or Cadillac for a smaller car, or Donna Karan where to find her sweatpants.
Customers have a plethora of choices, even though subbranders think otherwise. Why search out an more expensive hotel when you have Hilton, Hyatt or Marriott? Subbranding is an inside-out branding strategy because it forces the core of the brand into new directions.
Another common problem is what you could call the mega brand. It’s the idea, most commonly found within the car industry. Ford isn’t our brand, Aspire, Escort, Taurus and Mustang are. Well I’ve yet to drive down the road and see a sign for Mustang.
What I learned: When you feel the need to create subbrands, you are chasing the market, not building a brand.
_gern